MokoConsulting/MokoCassiopeia
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 4 Pull Requests Actions Packages Releases 1 Activity

chore: Sync MokoStandards 04.02.12 #103

Closed
jmiller-moko wants to merge 38 commits from chore/sync-mokostandards-v04.02.12 into main
pull from: chore/sync-mokostandards-v04.02.12
merge into: MokoConsulting:main
Conversation 1 Commits 38 Files Changed 17 +171 -116
1 changed files with 171 additions and 116 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit b8a28a60e2 - Show all commits

287
SECURITY.md
View File

@@ -1,185 +1,240 @@
<!--
Copyright (C) 2025 Moko Consulting <hello@mokoconsulting.tech>
Copyright (C) 2026 Moko Consulting <hello@mokoconsulting.tech>
This file is part of a Moko Consulting project.
This file is part of a Moko Consulting project.
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
# FILE INFORMATION
DEFGROUP: Joomla.Template
INGROUP: MokoCassiopeia.Governance
REPO: https://github.com/mokoconsulting-tech/MokoCassiopeia
FILE: SECURITY.md
VERSION: 03.06.02
BRIEF: Security policy and vulnerability reporting process for MokoCassiopeia.
PATH: /SECURITY.md
NOTE: This policy is process oriented and does not replace secure engineering practices.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# FILE INFORMATION
DEFGROUP: [PROJECT_NAME]
INGROUP: [PROJECT_NAME].Documentation
REPO: [REPOSITORY_URL]
PATH: /SECURITY.md
VERSION: 04.02.08
BRIEF: Security vulnerability reporting and handling policy
-->
## Security Policy
# Security Policy
This document defines how MokoCassiopeia handles vulnerability intake, triage, remediation, and disclosure. The objective is to reduce risk, protect downstream users, and preserve operational continuity with a verifiable audit trail.
## Purpose and Scope
## Scope
This policy applies to:
* Repository source code, workflows, scripts, and build artifacts.
* Release packaging (ZIP outputs) generated from the repository.
* Configuration and metadata used for distribution (for example manifests and update metadata).
Out of scope:
* Vulnerabilities in upstream Joomla core, third party extensions, or external infrastructure not controlled by this repository.
* Issues that require physical access to a host, compromised administrator credentials, or a compromised hosting provider, unless the repository materially increases impact.
This document defines the security vulnerability reporting, response, and disclosure policy for [PROJECT_NAME] and all repositories governed by these standards. It establishes the authoritative process for responsible disclosure, assessment, remediation, and communication of security issues.
## Supported Versions
Security fixes are prioritized for:
Security updates are provided for the following versions:
* The latest released version.
* The current development line when it is actively used for release engineering.
| Version | Supported |
| ------- | ------------------ |
| [X.x.x] | :white_check_mark: |
| < [X.0] | :x: |
Backports may be provided based on impact, deployment footprint, and engineering capacity.
Only the current major version receives security updates. Users should upgrade to the latest supported version to receive security patches.
## Reporting a Vulnerability
Use one of the following channels:
### Where to Report
* GitHub Security Advisories (preferred): use the repository security tab to submit a private report.
* Email: send details to `hello@mokoconsulting.tech` with subject `SECURITY: MokoCassiopeia vulnerability report`.
**DO NOT** create public GitHub issues for security vulnerabilities.
Do not file a public GitHub issue for suspected security vulnerabilities.
Report security vulnerabilities privately to:
### What to include
**Email**: `security@[DOMAIN]`
Provide enough detail to reproduce and triage:
**Subject Line**: `[SECURITY] Brief Description`
* A clear description of the vulnerability and expected impact.
* A minimal proof of concept or reproduction steps.
* Affected versions, configuration assumptions, and environment details.
* Any proposed mitigation or patch.
* Your preferred contact details for follow up.
### What to Include
## Triage and Response Targets
A complete vulnerability report should include:
The project operates with response targets aligned to practical delivery realities:
1. **Description**: Clear explanation of the vulnerability
2. **Impact**: Potential security impact and severity assessment
3. **Affected Versions**: Which versions are vulnerable
4. **Reproduction Steps**: Detailed steps to reproduce the issue
5. **Proof of Concept**: Code, configuration, or demonstration (if applicable)
6. **Suggested Fix**: Proposed remediation (if known)
7. **Disclosure Timeline**: Your expectations for public disclosure
* **Acknowledgement:** within 3 business days.
* **Initial triage:** within 10 business days.
* **Fix plan:** communicated once severity is confirmed.
### Response Timeline
These targets are not guarantees. Complex issues, supply chain considerations, and coordination with upstream vendors may extend timelines.
* **Initial Response**: Within 3 business days
* **Assessment Complete**: Within 7 business days
* **Fix Timeline**: Depends on severity (see below)
* **Disclosure**: Coordinated with reporter
## Severity Assessment
## Severity Classification
Issues are triaged based on business impact and technical exploitability, including:
Vulnerabilities are classified using the following severity levels:
* Remote exploitability and required privileges.
* Data confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
* Likelihood of exploitation in typical Joomla deployments.
* Exposure surface (public endpoints, administrator area, installation flows, and update mechanisms).
### Critical
* Remote code execution
* Authentication bypass
* Data breach or exposure of sensitive information
* **Fix Timeline**: 7 days
When appropriate, industry standard scoring such as CVSS may be used for internal prioritization.
### High
* Privilege escalation
* SQL injection or command injection
* Cross-site scripting (XSS) with significant impact
* **Fix Timeline**: 14 days
## Coordinated Disclosure
### Medium
* Information disclosure (limited scope)
* Denial of service
* Security misconfigurations with moderate impact
* **Fix Timeline**: 30 days
The project follows coordinated vulnerability disclosure:
### Low
* Security best practice violations
* Minor information leaks
* Issues requiring user interaction or complex preconditions
* **Fix Timeline**: 60 days or next release
* Reports are treated as confidential until remediation is available.
* A public advisory may be published once a fix is released.
* A reasonable embargo period is expected to enable patch distribution.
## Remediation Process
If you believe disclosure is time sensitive due to active exploitation, include that assessment and any supporting indicators.
1. **Acknowledgment**: Security team confirms receipt and begins investigation
2. **Assessment**: Vulnerability is validated, severity assigned, and impact analyzed
3. **Development**: Security patch is developed and tested
4. **Review**: Patch undergoes security review and validation
5. **Release**: Fixed version is released with security advisory
6. **Disclosure**: Public disclosure follows coordinated timeline
## Security Updates and Advisories
## Security Advisories
Security updates are distributed through:
Security advisories are published via:
* GitHub releases for the repository.
* GitHub Security Advisories when applicable.
* GitHub Security Advisories
* Release notes and CHANGELOG.md
* Security mailing list (when established)
Advisories may include:
Advisories include:
* Affected versions and fixed versions.
* Mitigations and workarounds when a fix is not immediately available.
* Upgrade guidance.
* CVE identifier (if applicable)
* Severity rating
* Affected versions
* Fixed versions
* Mitigation steps
* Attribution (with reporter consent)
## Dependencies and Supply Chain Controls
## Security Best Practices
The project aims to manage supply chain risk through:
For repositories adopting MokoStandards:
* Pinning and review of workflow dependencies where feasible.
* Minimizing privileged GitHub token permissions.
* Validating build inputs prior to packaging releases.
### Required Controls
If you identify a supply chain issue (for example compromised action, dependency confusion, or malicious upstream artifact), report it as a vulnerability.
* Enable GitHub security features (Dependabot, code scanning)
* Implement branch protection on `main`
* Require code review for all changes
* Enforce signed commits (recommended)
* Use secrets management (never commit credentials)
* Maintain security documentation
* Follow secure coding standards defined in `/docs/policy/`
## Secure Development and CI Expectations
### CI/CD Security
Security posture is reinforced through operational controls:
* Validate all inputs
* Sanitize outputs
* Use least privilege access
* Pin dependencies with hash verification
* Scan for vulnerabilities in dependencies
* Audit third-party actions and tools
* CI validation for packaging inputs and manifest integrity.
* Consistent path normalization and whitespace hygiene checks where required for release correctness.
* Least privilege for GitHub Actions permissions.
#### Automated Security Scanning
### Template Security Features
All repositories MUST implement:
**Custom Head Content Injection**
**CodeQL Analysis**:
* Enabled for all supported languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C/C++, C#, Go, Ruby)
* Runs on: push to main, pull requests, weekly schedule
* Query sets: `security-extended` and `security-and-quality`
* Configuration: `.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml`
The template provides Custom Head Code fields (`custom_head_start` and `custom_head_end`) that allow administrators to inject custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code. This is an intentional feature for:
**Dependabot Security Updates**:
* Weekly scans for vulnerable dependencies
* Automated pull requests for security patches
* Configuration: `.github/dependabot.yml`
* Adding analytics scripts (Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager)
* Custom meta tags
* Third-party integrations
* Custom styling
**Secret Scanning**:
* Enabled by default with push protection
* Prevents accidental credential commits
* Partner patterns enabled
**Security Considerations:**
**Dependency Review**:
* Required for all pull requests
* Blocks introduction of known vulnerable dependencies
* Automatic license compliance checking
* These fields use `filter="raw"` to allow HTML/JS injection
* **Access is restricted to Joomla administrators only** via template configuration
* This is not an XSS vulnerability as it requires administrator privileges
* Administrators should only add trusted code from verified sources
* Regular security audits should review custom head content
See [Security Scanning Policy](docs/policy/security-scanning.md) for detailed requirements.
This policy does not guarantee that all vulnerabilities will be prevented. It defines how risk is managed when issues are discovered.
### Dependency Management
## Safe Harbor
* Keep dependencies up to date
* Monitor security advisories for dependencies
* Remove unused dependencies
* Audit new dependencies before adoption
* Document security-critical dependencies
The project supports good faith security research. When you:
## Compliance and Governance
* Avoid privacy violations, data destruction, and service disruption.
* Limit testing to systems you own or have explicit permission to test.
* Provide a reasonable window for coordinated disclosure.
This security policy is binding for all repositories governed by MokoStandards. Deviations require documented justification and approval from the Security Owner.
Then the project will treat your report as a constructive security contribution.
Security policies are reviewed and updated at least annually or following significant security incidents.
Jurisdiction note: this repository is managed from Tennessee, USA. This note is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
## Attribution and Recognition
## Public Communications
We acknowledge and appreciate responsible disclosure. With your permission, we will:
Only maintainers will publish security advisories or public statements for confirmed vulnerabilities. Public communication will focus on actionable remediation and operational risk reduction.
* Credit you in security advisories
* List you in CHANGELOG.md for the fix release
* Recognize your contribution publicly (if desired)
## Acknowledgements
## Contact and Escalation
If you want credit, include the name or handle to list in an advisory. If you prefer anonymity, state that explicitly.
* **Security Team**: security@[DOMAIN]
* **Primary Contact**: [CONTACT_EMAIL]
* **Escalation**: For urgent matters requiring immediate attention, contact the maintainer directly via GitHub
## Out of Scope
The following are explicitly out of scope:
* Issues in third-party dependencies (report directly to maintainers)
* Social engineering attacks
* Physical security issues
* Denial of service via resource exhaustion without amplification
* Issues requiring physical access to systems
* Theoretical vulnerabilities without proof of exploitability
---
## Metadata
* **Document:** SECURITY.md
* **Repository:** [https://github.com/mokoconsulting-tech/MokoCassiopeia](https://github.com/mokoconsulting-tech/MokoCassiopeia)
* **Path:** /SECURITY.md
* **Owner:** Moko Consulting
* **Version:** 03.06.00
* **Status:** Active
* **Effective Date:** 2025-12-18
* **Last Reviewed:** 2025-12-18
| Field | Value |
| ------------ | ----------------------------------------------- |
| Document | Security Policy |
| Path | /SECURITY.md |
| Repository | [REPOSITORY_URL] |
| Owner | [OWNER_NAME] |
| Scope | Security vulnerability handling |
| Applies To | All repositories governed by MokoStandards |
| Status | Active |
| Effective | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
## Revision History
| Date | Change Summary | Author |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------- |
| 2026-01-30 | Added Template Security Features section documenting custom head content injection controls. | Copilot Agent |
| 2025-12-18 | Initial publication of security policy, intake channels, triage targets, and disclosure process. | Moko Consulting |
| Date | Change Description | Author |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | Initial creation | [AUTHOR_NAME] |