Adds a Require2FA toggle to organization settings. When enabled,
org members without 2FA are redirected to the security settings
page with a warning flash message.
Changes:
- New Require2FA field on User model (migration v333)
- Org settings UI checkbox with shield-lock icon
- Check2FARequirement middleware on member-required org routes
- UpdateOptions extended with Require2FA field
Closes#208
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The org home page template expects .Members, .NumMembers, .Teams,
.IsOrganizationMember, .IsOrganizationOwner, and .IsPublicMember
but the handler only set OrgOverviewMembers and OrgOverviewTeams
(different key names). The sidebar rendered empty because the
template variables were undefined.
Fixed by adding all required data bindings and capturing the
membersIsPublic map (previously discarded) as a callable function.
Closes#183
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rename the Go module path from code.gitea.io/gitea to
git.mokoconsulting.tech/MokoConsulting/MokoGitea across the entire
codebase.
Scope:
- go.mod module declaration
- 2,235 Go source files (import paths)
- Dockerfile WORKDIR and COPY paths
- Swagger API templates
- golangci.yml linter config
External dependencies (code.gitea.io/gitea-vet, code.gitea.io/sdk/gitea,
gitea.com/gitea/act, etc.) are intentionally NOT renamed — they are
separate upstream modules.
Closes#132
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- gocron v2.19.1 uses LastRun() not LastRunStartedAt()
- renderhelper.RepoFileOptions uses CurrentRefPath not CurrentRefSubURL
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix team members missing from assignee list when `team_unit.access_mode`
is 0 but the doer is owner.
Fix #34871
1. Use `GetTeamUserIDsWithAccessToAnyRepoUnit` for repo assignee list
2. Load assignee list for project issues directly
3. Use `GetTeamUserIDsWithAccessToAnyRepoUnit` for repo reviewer list
Signed-off-by: Jakub Pisarczyk <pisarz77@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Use the new "form-fetch-action" for better user experience, and use
JSONError to show error messages.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
When the email field was submitted as empty in org settings (web and
API), the previous guard `if form.Email != ""` silently skipped the
update, making it impossible to remove a contact email after it was set.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
## Overview
This PR introduces granular permission controls for Gitea Actions tokens
(`GITEA_TOKEN`), aligning Gitea's security model with GitHub Actions
standards while maintaining compatibility with Gitea's unique repository
unit system.
It addresses the need for finer access control by allowing
administrators and repository owners to define default token
permissions, set maximum permission ceilings, and control
cross-repository access within organizations.
## Key Features
### 1. Granular Token Permissions
- **Standard Keyword Support**: Implements support for the
`permissions:` keyword in workflow and job YAML files (e.g., `contents:
read`, `issues: write`).
- **Permission Modes**:
- **Permissive**: Default write access for most units (backwards
compatible).
- **Restricted**: Default read-only access for `contents` and
`packages`, with no access to other units.
- ~~**Custom**: Allows defining specific default levels for each unit
type (Code, Issues, PRs, Packages, etc.).~~**EDIT removed UI was
confusing**
- **Clamping Logic**: Workflow-defined permissions are automatically
"clamped" by repository or organization-level maximum settings.
Workflows cannot escalate their own permissions beyond these limits.
### 2. Organization & Repository Settings
- **Settings UI**: Added new settings pages at both Organization and
Repository levels to manage Actions token defaults and maximums.
- **Inheritance**: Repositories can be configured to "Follow
organization-level configuration," simplifying management across large
organizations.
- **Cross-Repository Access**: Added a policy to control whether Actions
workflows can access other repositories or packages within the same
organization. This can be set to "None," "All," or restricted to a
"Selected" list of repositories.
### 3. Security Hardening
- **Fork Pull Request Protection**: Tokens for workflows triggered by
pull requests from forks are strictly enforced as read-only, regardless
of repository settings.
- ~~**Package Access**: Actions tokens can now only access packages
explicitly linked to a repository, with cross-repo access governed by
the organization's security policy.~~ **EDIT removed
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/36173#issuecomment-3873675346**
- **Git Hook Integration**: Propagates Actions Task IDs to git hooks to
ensure that pushes performed by Actions tokens respect the specific
permissions granted at runtime.
### 4. Technical Implementation
- **Permission Persistence**: Parsed permissions are calculated at job
creation and stored in the `action_run_job` table. This ensures the
token's authority is deterministic throughout the job's lifecycle.
- **Parsing Priority**: Implemented a priority system in the YAML parser
where the broad `contents` scope is applied first, allowing granular
scopes like `code` or `releases` to override it for precise control.
- **Re-runs**: Permissions are re-evaluated during a job re-run to
incorporate any changes made to repository settings in the interim.
### How to Test
1. **Unit Tests**: Run `go test ./services/actions/...` and `go test
./models/repo/...` to verify parsing logic and permission clamping.
2. **Integration Tests**: Comprehensive tests have been added to
`tests/integration/actions_job_token_test.go` covering:
- Permissive vs. Restricted mode behavior.
- YAML `permissions:` keyword evaluation.
- Organization cross-repo access policies.
- Resource access (Git, API, and Packages) under various permission
configs.
3. **Manual Verification**:
- Navigate to **Site/Org/Repo Settings -> Actions -> General**.
- Change "Default Token Permissions" and verify that newly triggered
workflows reflect these changes in their `GITEA_TOKEN` capabilities.
- Attempt a cross-repo API call from an Action and verify the Org policy
is enforced.
## Documentation
Added a PR in gitea's docs for this :
https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/318
## UI:
<img width="1366" height="619" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-24 174112"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bfa29c9a-4ea5-4346-9410-16d491ef3d44"
/>
<img width="1360" height="621" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-24 174048"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d5ec46c8-9a13-4874-a6a4-fb379936cef5"
/>
/fixes #24635
/claim #24635
---------
Signed-off-by: Excellencedev <ademiluyisuccessandexcellence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Signed-off-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This pull request adds milestone filtering support to both repository
and organization project boards. Users can now filter project issues by
milestone, similar to how they filter by label or assignee. The
implementation includes backend changes to fetch and filter milestones,
as well as frontend updates to display a milestone filter dropdown in
the project board UI.
**Milestone filtering support:**
* Added support for filtering project board issues by milestone in both
repository and organization contexts, including handling for "no
milestone" and "all milestones" options. (`routers/web/repo/projects.go`
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5cba331a1ddf1eea017178cfefaaff9ad72a4b05797fb84bf508b0939aae2972R316-R330)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-5cba331a1ddf1eea017178cfefaaff9ad72a4b05797fb84bf508b0939aae2972R421-R441);
`routers/web/org/projects.go`
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-f4279417070a8e33829c338abeb42877500377f490abb1495ae6357d50b6a765R344-R357)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-f4279417070a8e33829c338abeb42877500377f490abb1495ae6357d50b6a765R433-R485)
* Updated the project board template to include a milestone filter
dropdown, displaying open and closed milestones and integrating with the
query string for filtering. (`templates/projects/view.tmpl`
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e2c7e14d247ce381c352263a8fa639b8341690ff85f6dbebfa166ee3306542feL8-R8)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e2c7e14d247ce381c352263a8fa639b8341690ff85f6dbebfa166ee3306542feR19-R58)
Solves Issue #35224
---------
Signed-off-by: josetduarte <6619440+josetduarte@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joseduarte <joseduarte@aidhound.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Presently, attempting to rename a non-local (e.g. Oauth2 or LDAP) user
results in an error, even if the requester is an administrator. As far
as I can tell, this is a security feature, not architectural in nature,
as automatic account linking could be used to take control of another
user's account. This is not a concern for an administrator, who we
should trust to know what they are doing.
This patch allows admins, and only admins, to rename non-local users.
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/18308 (sort of)
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Similar to #34544, this PR changes the `opts` argument in
`SearchRepositoryByName()` to be passed by value instead of by pointer,
as its mutations do not escape the function scope and are not used
elsewhere. This simplifies reasoning about the function and avoids
unnecessary pointer usage.
This insight emerged during an initial attempt to refactor
`RenderUserSearch()`, which currently intermixes multiple concerns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philip Peterson <philip-peterson@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix#2616
This PR adds a new sort option for exclusive labels.
For exclusive labels, a new property is exposed called "order", while in
the UI options are populated automatically in the `Sort` column (see
screenshot below) for each exclusive label scope.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870#8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
In history (from some legacy frameworks), both `:name` and `name` are
supported as path path name, `:name` is an alias to `name`.
To make code consistent, now we should only use `name` but not `:name`.
Also added panic check in related functions to make sure the name won't
be abused in case some downstreams still use them.
`RepoTransfer` now is at models, but if we want to move it into `repo`
model, it will depend on `Team`. So this PR also makes repo model depend
on org model to make it possible. Just refactor, no code change.
- [x] Move `DeleteOrganization` from `models/organization` to service
layer
- [x] Move `AccessibleTeamReposEnv` to `models/repo`
- [x] Move `RepoTransfer` from `models` to `models/repo`
- [x] Merge `getUserTeamIDs` and `GetUserTeamIDs`, Merge `GetUserTeams`
and `getUserTeams`.
- [x] Remove `Team`'s `Repos []*repo_model.Repository` to avoid dependency recycle.
Replace #26661, fix#25979
Not perfect, but usable and much better than before. Since it is quite
complex, I am not quite sure whether there would be any regression, if
any, I will fix in first time.
I have tested the related pages many times: issue list, milestone issue
list, project view, user issue list, org issue list.
Rewrite a lot of legacy strange code, remove duplicate code, remove
jquery, and make these filters reusable.
Let's forget the old code, new code affects:
* issue list open/close switch
* issue list filter (label, author, assignee)
* milestone list open/close switch
* milestone issue list filter (label, author, assignee)
* project view (label, assignee)
There are still some functions under `models` after last big refactor
about `models`. This change will move all team related functions to
service layer with no code change.
Jonathan Miller
