Fix for Syntax error #55

2026-01-17T23:34:30Z

jmiller-moko commented

2026-01-17 23:34:30 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

To fix the problem, we need to correct the indentation so that the creation of result and the call to common.json_output(result) are clearly inside the try: block at the same logical level as the preceding zip_path = create_package(...) and before the return 0. No behavioral changes are required beyond making the code syntactically valid.

Concretely, within main() near the end of the try: block (around lines 308–314), we should re-indent the result = {...} dictionary literal and common.json_output(result) so they are indented exactly one level inside the try: block, consistent with zip_path = create_package(...) and the following return 0. This involves changing the spacing before those lines (and the dict’s inner lines) to match the surrounding code’s indentation style (tabs in this file). We do not need new imports or methods; we only adjust indentation.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

To fix the problem, we need to correct the indentation so that the creation of `result` and the call to `common.json_output(result)` are clearly inside the `try:` block at the same logical level as the preceding `zip_path = create_package(...)` and before the `return 0`. No behavioral changes are required beyond making the code syntactically valid. Concretely, within `main()` near the end of the `try:` block (around lines 308–314), we should re-indent the `result = {...}` dictionary literal and `common.json_output(result)` so they are indented exactly one level inside the `try:` block, consistent with `zip_path = create_package(...)` and the following `return 0`. This involves changing the spacing before those lines (and the dict’s inner lines) to match the surrounding code’s indentation style (tabs in this file). We do not need new imports or methods; we only adjust indentation. _Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging._

github-actions[bot] commented

2026-01-17 23:34:39 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

<h1>Dependency Review</h1> ✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.<h2>Scanned Files</h2> None

copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2026-01-17 23:36:46 +00:00

copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request. --- 💡 <a href="/mokoconsulting-tech/moko-cassiopeia/new/main/.github/instructions?filename=*.instructions.md" class="Link--inTextBlock" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Add Copilot custom instructions</a> for smarter, more guided reviews. <a href="https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/customizing-copilot/adding-repository-custom-instructions-for-github-copilot" class="Link--inTextBlock" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learn how to get started</a>.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: MokoConsulting/MokoCassiopeia#55