Some checks failed
Standards Compliance / Secret Scanning (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / License Header Validation (push) Successful in 4s
Standards Compliance / Repository Structure Validation (push) Successful in 5s
Standards Compliance / Coding Standards Check (push) Failing after 3s
Standards Compliance / Version Consistency Check (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Workflow Configuration Check (push) Failing after 2s
Standards Compliance / Documentation Quality Check (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / README Completeness Check (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Git Repository Hygiene (push) Successful in 2s
Standards Compliance / Script Integrity Validation (push) Successful in 4s
Standards Compliance / Line Length Check (push) Failing after 4s
Standards Compliance / File Naming Standards (push) Successful in 2s
Standards Compliance / Insecure Code Pattern Detection (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Code Complexity Analysis (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Code Duplication Detection (push) Successful in 4s
Standards Compliance / Dead Code Detection (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / File Size Limits (push) Successful in 2s
CodeQL Security Scanning / Analyze (javascript) (push) Failing after 1m9s
Standards Compliance / Binary File Detection (push) Successful in 4s
CodeQL Security Scanning / Analyze (actions) (push) Failing after 1m11s
Standards Compliance / TODO/FIXME Tracking (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Dependency Vulnerability Scanning (push) Successful in 5s
Standards Compliance / Broken Link Detection (push) Successful in 5s
Standards Compliance / Unused Dependencies Check (push) Successful in 7s
Standards Compliance / API Documentation Coverage (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Accessibility Check (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Performance Metrics (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Enterprise Readiness Check (push) Successful in 3s
Standards Compliance / Repository Health Check (push) Successful in 4s
Standards Compliance / Terraform Configuration Validation (push) Successful in 6s
CodeQL Security Scanning / Security Scan Summary (push) Successful in 1s
Standards Compliance / Compliance Summary (push) Successful in 1s
Repo Health / Access control (push) Successful in 1s
Auto-Update SHA Hash / Update SHA-256 Hash in updates.xml (release) Successful in 4s
Repo Health / Release configuration (push) Failing after 3s
Repo Health / Scripts governance (push) Successful in 3s
Repo Health / Repository health (push) Failing after 3s
All files renamed from mokocassiopeia to mokoonyx. Update server points to MokoOnyx repo. Bridge migration removed (clean standalone template). Version reset to 01.00.00. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
116 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
116 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
<!--
|
|
Copyright (C) 2025 Moko Consulting <hello@mokoconsulting.tech>
|
|
|
|
This file is part of a Moko Consulting project.
|
|
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
|
|
|
|
# FILE INFORMATION
|
|
DEFGROUP: Joomla.Template
|
|
INGROUP: MokoOnyx.Governance
|
|
REPO: https://git.mokoconsulting.tech/MokoConsulting/MokoOnyx
|
|
FILE: GOVERNANCE.md
|
|
VERSION: 03.09.03
|
|
BRIEF: Project governance model, roles, and decision processes for MokoOnyx.
|
|
PATH: /GOVERNANCE.md
|
|
NOTE: This document defines authority, decision making, and escalation paths.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Governance Overview
|
|
|
|
This document defines the governance framework for the MokoOnyx project. The objective is to ensure clear ownership, predictable decision making, and accountable stewardship across development, releases, and community interaction.
|
|
|
|
## Project Ownership
|
|
|
|
MokoOnyx is owned and maintained by **Moko Consulting**. Final authority for project direction, releases, and policy enforcement resides with the project owner.
|
|
|
|
## Roles and Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
### Maintainers
|
|
|
|
Maintainers are responsible for:
|
|
|
|
* Setting technical direction and release priorities.
|
|
* Reviewing and approving pull requests.
|
|
* Managing releases and distribution artifacts.
|
|
* Enforcing repository policies, including security and conduct requirements.
|
|
|
|
### Contributors
|
|
|
|
Contributors may:
|
|
|
|
* Submit pull requests and issues.
|
|
* Propose enhancements and report defects.
|
|
* Participate in technical discussions.
|
|
|
|
Contributors do not have merge authority unless explicitly granted.
|
|
|
|
## Decision Making
|
|
|
|
Decisions are made using a maintainers led model:
|
|
|
|
* Routine changes are approved through pull request review.
|
|
* Material changes affecting architecture, branding, licensing, or release processes require maintainer consensus.
|
|
* The project owner retains final decision authority if consensus cannot be reached.
|
|
|
|
## Change Management
|
|
|
|
Significant changes should:
|
|
|
|
* Be documented through issues or pull requests with clear rationale.
|
|
* Consider backward compatibility and upgrade impact.
|
|
* Include documentation updates when behavior or usage changes.
|
|
|
|
## Release Authority
|
|
|
|
Only maintainers may:
|
|
|
|
* Cut releases and publish artifacts.
|
|
* Update version numbers and manifests.
|
|
* Publish update metadata or advisories.
|
|
|
|
Release processes follow documented workflows and automation standards.
|
|
|
|
## Security Governance
|
|
|
|
Security issues are governed by the SECURITY.md policy. Maintainers are responsible for confidential handling, coordinated disclosure, and publication of advisories when appropriate.
|
|
|
|
## Conduct Enforcement
|
|
|
|
Behavior within the project is governed by CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. Maintainers are responsible for enforcement actions and escalation handling.
|
|
|
|
## Conflict Resolution
|
|
|
|
Conflicts are handled through:
|
|
|
|
* Direct discussion between involved parties when appropriate.
|
|
* Maintainer mediation when necessary.
|
|
* Final determination by the project owner if required.
|
|
|
|
## External Dependencies
|
|
|
|
The project depends on Joomla core and other third party components. Governance of upstream projects remains outside the scope of this repository, but upstream changes may influence project decisions.
|
|
|
|
## Jurisdiction
|
|
|
|
This project is managed from Tennessee, USA. This statement is informational and does not constitute legal advice.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
|
|
* **Document:** GOVERNANCE.md
|
|
* **Repository:** [https://git.mokoconsulting.tech/MokoConsulting/MokoOnyx](https://git.mokoconsulting.tech/MokoConsulting/MokoOnyx)
|
|
* **Path:** /GOVERNANCE.md
|
|
* **Owner:** Moko Consulting
|
|
* **Version:** 03.06.00
|
|
* **Status:** Active
|
|
* **Effective Date:** 2025-12-18
|
|
* **Last Reviewed:** 2025-12-18
|
|
|
|
## Revision History
|
|
|
|
| Date | Change Summary | Author |
|
|
| ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
|
|
| 2025-12-18 | Initial publication of governance model, roles, and decision processes. | Moko Consulting |
|